Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FBTAX
ETNHX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FBTAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FBTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. ETNHX (1.18B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FBTAX (2.74) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FBTAX (25 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX (73.00) and ETNHX (71.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FBTAX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.36 vs. FBTAX (-4.01). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.22 vs. ETNHX (-15.60).
| ETNHX | FBTAX | ETNHX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.349 | 6.578 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 1.4B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | -4.01 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.82 | 22.94 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.60 | -3.22 | 485% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.04 | 1.20 | 3,429% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement