Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FBTAX
ETNHX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FBTAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FBTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.61B vs. ETNHX (1.38B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FBTAX (2.34) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FBTAX (25 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX (73.00) and ETNHX (71.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FBTAX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.98 vs. FBTAX (4.86). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.42 vs. ETNHX (-13.31).
| ETNHX | FBTAX | ETNHX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.326 | 23.999 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 1.61B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.98 | 4.86 | 370% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.31 | 49.94 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.31 | 5.42 | -245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.51 | 47.11 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement