Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FBTAX
ETNHX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FBTAX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FBTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. ETNHX (1.15B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FBTAX (3.05) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FBTAX (25 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX (73.00) and ETNHX (71.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FBTAX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.21 vs. FBTAX (-10.29). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : -14.50 vs. ETNHX (-22.04).
| ETNHX | FBTAX | ETNHX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.403 | -4.079 | -59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 1.28B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.21 | -10.29 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.96 | 26.35 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.04 | -14.50 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.92 | -10.27 | -282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement