Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FBTAX
ETNHX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FBTAX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a StrongBuy and FBTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.37B vs. ETNHX (1.05B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FBTAX (2.96) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: ETNHX (12 years) vs FBTAX (24 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX (73.00) and ETNHX (71.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FBTAX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX (-10.04) and FBTAX (-10.54) have marching annual gain over last year. FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : -14.23 vs. ETNHX (-25.26).
| ETNHX | FBTAX | ETNHX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.915 | -7.865 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 1.37B | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.96 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.04 | -10.54 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.06 | 24.84 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.26 | -14.23 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.33 | -10.67 | -209% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement