Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FBTAX
ETNHX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FBTAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Buy and FBTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. ETNHX (1.27B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FBTAX (2.74) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FBTAX (25 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX (73.00) and ETNHX (71.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FBTAX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. FBTAX (-6.50). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.74 vs. ETNHX (-9.15).
| ETNHX | FBTAX | ETNHX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.344 | 10.364 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 1.4B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.05 | -6.50 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.58 | 29.90 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.15 | 1.74 | -525% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.45 | 8.77 | 666% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement