Ad is loading...
ETNHX vs FSPHX
ETNHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. ETNHX (1.02B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETNHX (12 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). ETNHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.31 vs. ETNHX (-16.10). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -7.06 vs. ETNHX (-18.96).
| ETNHX | FSPHX | ETNHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.65 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.65 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.693 | -5.798 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 6.42B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.10 | -8.31 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.87 | -9.31 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.96 | -7.06 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.04 | 8.14 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers