Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FSPHX
ETNHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. ETNHX (1.38B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). ETNHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.98 vs. FSPHX (-9.53). ETNHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.31 vs. FSPHX (-14.37).
| ETNHX | FSPHX | ETNHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.326 | 3.303 | 827% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 5.96B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.98 | -9.53 | -189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.31 | 7.01 | 532% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.31 | -14.37 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.51 | 36.08 | 268% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers