ETOLF
Price
$1.15
Change
-$0.02 (-1.71%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
17.25M
HGHAF
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.01 (-1.64%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
48.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ETOLF vs HGHAF

Header iconETOLF vs HGHAF Comparison
Open Charts ETOLF vs HGHAFBanner chart's image
Enterprise Group
Price$1.15
Change-$0.02 (-1.71%)
Volume$7.83K
Capitalization17.25M
HIGH ARCTIC ENERGY SVCS INC NEW
Price$0.60
Change-$0.01 (-1.64%)
Volume$12.9K
Capitalization48.84M
ETOLF vs HGHAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ETOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ETOLF vs. HGHAF commentary
Jun 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETOLF is a Hold and HGHAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 02, 2025
Stock price -- (ETOLF: $1.15 vs. HGHAF: $0.60)
Brand notoriety: ETOLF and HGHAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ETOLF: 15% vs. HGHAF: 186%
Market capitalization -- ETOLF: $17.25M vs. HGHAF: $48.84M
ETOLF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $17.25M. HGHAF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $48.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ETOLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHGHAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ETOLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HGHAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ETOLF is a better buy in the long-term than HGHAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ETOLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ETOLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ETOLF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -4.80% price change this week, while HGHAF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+0.36% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HGHAF($48.8M) has a higher market cap than ETOLF($17.2M). ETOLF YTD gains are higher at: -13.319 vs. HGHAF (-23.077). ETOLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.28M vs. HGHAF (-9.77M). HGHAF has more cash in the bank: 46.7M vs. ETOLF (1.55M). HGHAF has less debt than ETOLF: HGHAF (5.51M) vs ETOLF (14.5M). HGHAF has higher revenues than ETOLF: HGHAF (60.8M) vs ETOLF (29.3M).
ETOLFHGHAFETOLF / HGHAF
Capitalization17.2M48.8M35%
EBITDA9.28M-9.77M-95%
Gain YTD-13.319-23.07758%
P/E Ratio6.17N/A-
Revenue29.3M60.8M48%
Total Cash1.55M46.7M3%
Total Debt14.5M5.51M263%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ETOLF vs HGHAF: Fundamental Ratings
ETOLF
HGHAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38100
SMR RATING
1..100
5818
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5288
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ETOLF's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as HGHAF (98). This means that ETOLF’s stock grew similarly to HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

ETOLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGHAF (100). This means that ETOLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

HGHAF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ETOLF (58). This means that HGHAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ETOLF’s over the last 12 months.

ETOLF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGHAF (88). This means that ETOLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

HGHAF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ETOLF (2). This means that HGHAF’s stock grew similarly to ETOLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETOLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ETOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLQS40.510.09
+0.22%
Franklin US Small Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
HAP50.230.03
+0.06%
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
GAB5.76-0.01
-0.17%
Gabelli Equity Trust (The)
RXD12.58-0.09
-0.73%
ProShares UltraShort Health Care
RSPG71.67-0.93
-1.28%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy ETF

ETOLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ETOLF and CESDF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ETOLF and CESDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETOLF
1D Price
Change %
ETOLF100%
-1.71%
CESDF - ETOLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
CTNR - ETOLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGHAF - ETOLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AKKVF - ETOLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATONY - ETOLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HGHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGHAF and SBFFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGHAF and SBFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGHAF
1D Price
Change %
HGHAF100%
N/A
SBFFF - HGHAF
33%
Poorly correlated
+11.16%
PDER - HGHAF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
NSFDF - HGHAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.52%
MCCRF - HGHAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.10%
ETOLF - HGHAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
More