EUXTF
Price
$114.00
Change
+$2.15 (+1.92%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
HKXCF
Price
$37.00
Change
-$1.06 (-2.79%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

EUXTF vs HKXCF

Header iconEUXTF vs HKXCF Comparison
Open Charts EUXTF vs HKXCFBanner chart's image
Euronext
Price$114.00
Change+$2.15 (+1.92%)
Volume$277
CapitalizationN/A
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$37.00
Change-$1.06 (-2.79%)
Volume$1.14K
CapitalizationN/A
EUXTF vs HKXCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EUXTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EUXTF vs. HKXCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EUXTF is a StrongBuy and HKXCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (EUXTF: $114.00 vs. HKXCF: $37.00)
Brand notoriety: EUXTF and HKXCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EUXTF: 88% vs. HKXCF: 47%
Market capitalization -- EUXTF: $8.12B vs. HKXCF: $52.98B
EUXTF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $8.12B. HKXCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $52.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EUXTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHKXCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EUXTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the long-term than EUXTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EUXTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HKXCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EUXTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HKXCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EUXTF is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCF.

Price Growth

EUXTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.92% price change this week, while HKXCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.36% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCF($53B) has a higher market cap than EUXTF($8.12B). HKXCF has higher P/E ratio than EUXTF: HKXCF (37.88) vs EUXTF (18.42). EUXTF YTD gains are higher at: 26.316 vs. HKXCF (6.131). HKXCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. EUXTF (750M). HKXCF has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. EUXTF (1.27B). HKXCF has less debt than EUXTF: HKXCF (1.76B) vs EUXTF (3.1B). HKXCF has higher revenues than EUXTF: HKXCF (16.4B) vs EUXTF (1.39B).
EUXTFHKXCFEUXTF / HKXCF
Capitalization8.12B53B15%
EBITDA750M16.2B5%
Gain YTD26.3166.131429%
P/E Ratio18.4237.8849%
Revenue1.39B16.4B8%
Total Cash1.27B265B0%
Total Debt3.1B1.76B176%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EUXTF vs HKXCF: Fundamental Ratings
EUXTF
HKXCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8559
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5584
SMR RATING
1..100
5241
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCF's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (91). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.

EUXTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCF (84). This means that EUXTF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (52). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (46). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (28). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EUXTFHKXCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EUXTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UJUL34.91-0.07
-0.20%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jul
PTLC55.28-0.26
-0.47%
Pacer Trendpilot™ US Large Cap ETF
STXD33.63-0.21
-0.63%
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF
RLY27.56-0.24
-0.86%
SPDR® SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
DAT46.55-0.45
-0.95%
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF

EUXTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EUXTF and HYHDF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EUXTF and HYHDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EUXTF
1D Price
Change %
EUXTF100%
N/A
HYHDF - EUXTF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABIT - EUXTF
11%
Poorly correlated
+12.49%
FLTLF - EUXTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYNA - EUXTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCF - EUXTF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
More

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCF has been loosely correlated with HKXCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCF jumps, then HKXCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
-2.79%
HKXCY - HKXCF
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
TIGR - HKXCF
35%
Loosely correlated
+5.59%
FUTU - HKXCF
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.52%
OSCUF - HKXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
DSEEY - HKXCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
More