It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EUXTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHKXCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EUXTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HKXCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
EUXTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.92% price change this week, while HKXCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.56%.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
EUXTF | HKXCF | EUXTF / HKXCF | |
Capitalization | 8.12B | 53B | 15% |
EBITDA | 750M | 16.2B | 5% |
Gain YTD | 26.316 | 6.131 | 429% |
P/E Ratio | 18.42 | 37.88 | 49% |
Revenue | 1.39B | 16.4B | 8% |
Total Cash | 1.27B | 265B | 0% |
Total Debt | 3.1B | 1.76B | 176% |
EUXTF | HKXCF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HKXCF's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (91). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.
EUXTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCF (84). This means that EUXTF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.
HKXCF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (52). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.
HKXCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (46). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.
HKXCF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (28). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.
EUXTF | HKXCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago35% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
UJUL | 34.91 | -0.07 | -0.20% |
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jul | |||
PTLC | 55.28 | -0.26 | -0.47% |
Pacer Trendpilot™ US Large Cap ETF | |||
STXD | 33.63 | -0.21 | -0.63% |
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF | |||
RLY | 27.56 | -0.24 | -0.86% |
SPDR® SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | |||
DAT | 46.55 | -0.45 | -0.95% |
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EUXTF and HYHDF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EUXTF and HYHDF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EUXTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EUXTF | 100% | N/A | ||
HYHDF - EUXTF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ABIT - EUXTF | 11% Poorly correlated | +12.49% | ||
FLTLF - EUXTF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DYNA - EUXTF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HKXCF - EUXTF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.79% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCF has been loosely correlated with HKXCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCF jumps, then HKXCY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKXCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HKXCF | 100% | -2.79% | ||
HKXCY - HKXCF | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
TIGR - HKXCF | 35% Loosely correlated | +5.59% | ||
FUTU - HKXCF | 34% Loosely correlated | +4.52% | ||
OSCUF - HKXCF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
DSEEY - HKXCF | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
More |