It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EUXTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHYHDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EUXTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HYHDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
EUXTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
EUXTF | HYHDF | EUXTF / HYHDF | |
Capitalization | 8.12B | 3.69M | 220,108% |
EBITDA | 750M | -22.02M | -3,405% |
Gain YTD | 47.739 | 123.810 | 39% |
P/E Ratio | 18.42 | 0.59 | 3,117% |
Revenue | 1.39B | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 1.27B | 6.21M | 20,454% |
Total Debt | 3.1B | 6.6M | 46,911% |
EUXTF | HYHDF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HYHDF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (93). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.
EUXTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYHDF (100). This means that EUXTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.
EUXTF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (77). This means that EUXTF’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.
HYHDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (45). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.
HYHDF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as EUXTF (23). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to EUXTF’s over the last 12 months.
EUXTF | HYHDF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago43% | 1 day ago89% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago33% | 1 day ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago39% | 1 day ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago42% | 1 day ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago33% | 1 day ago74% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SRTY | 16.15 | 0.17 | +1.06% |
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 | |||
XHYE | 38.47 | 0.10 | +0.26% |
BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sctr ETF | |||
CARK | 42.00 | N/A | N/A |
CastleArk Large Growth ETF | |||
SPBO | 29.24 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
SPDR® Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF | |||
RSMV | 24.99 | -0.13 | -0.51% |
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EUXTF and HYHDF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EUXTF and HYHDF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EUXTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EUXTF | 100% | N/A | ||
HYHDF - EUXTF | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
ABIT - EUXTF | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
FLTLF - EUXTF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
HKXCF - EUXTF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.51% | ||
HEHSF - EUXTF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and PIHG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and PIHG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HYHDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HYHDF | 100% | -2.87% | ||
PIHG - HYHDF | 20% Poorly correlated | -36.57% | ||
JPXGY - HYHDF | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
EUXTF - HYHDF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LNSTY - HYHDF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
HKXCY - HYHDF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
More |