Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVBLX vs NFRFX
EVBLX vs NFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVBLX vs. NFRFX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVBLX is a Hold and NFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EVBLX has more cash in the bank: 3.93B vs. NFRFX (2.03B). NFRFX pays higher dividends than EVBLX: NFRFX (7.99) vs EVBLX (6.78). EVBLX was incepted earlier than NFRFX: EVBLX (22 years) vs NFRFX (11 years). EVBLX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NFRFX (0.67). EVBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NFRFX (24.00). EVBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: EVBLX (1000) vs NFRFX (1000000). NFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. EVBLX (4.12). NFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.03 vs. EVBLX (28.90).
| EVBLX | NFRFX | EVBLX / NFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.67 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.67 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.181 | 4.482 | 49% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 2.03B | 193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.78 | 7.99 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | 6.77 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.54 | 30.79 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.90 | 41.03 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.92 | 66.87 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement