Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVBLX vs NFRFX
EVBLX vs NFRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVBLX vs. NFRFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVBLX is a Hold and NFRFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EVBLX has more cash in the bank: 4.13B vs. NFRFX (1.56B). NFRFX pays higher dividends than EVBLX: NFRFX (8.33) vs EVBLX (7.72). EVBLX was incepted earlier than NFRFX: EVBLX (22 years) vs NFRFX (10 years). EVBLX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NFRFX (0.67). EVBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NFRFX (24.00). EVBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: EVBLX (1000) vs NFRFX (1000000). NFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. EVBLX (5.59). NFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.48 vs. EVBLX (32.39).
| EVBLX | NFRFX | EVBLX / NFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.67 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.67 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.083 | 2.023 | 54% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 1.56B | 265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.72 | 8.33 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.59 | 7.35 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.13 | 27.88 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.39 | 42.48 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.46 | 59.90 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement