Ad is loading...
EVCGX vs FHKAX
EVCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$16.18
Change+$0.23 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.77M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$40.15
Change+$0.33 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
EVCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Buy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. EVCGX (37.8M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: EVCGX (1.97) vs FHKAX (1.22). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than EVCGX (5%) vs EVCGX (5%). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKAX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). EVCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.67 vs. FHKAX (13.54). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.36 vs. EVCGX (-29.73).
| EVCGX | FHKAX | EVCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.18 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.18 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.918 | 3.806 | 287% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.8M | 1.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.22 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.67 | 13.54 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.01 | 32.34 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.73 | 6.36 | -467% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.95 | 10.87 | -285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...