Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKAX
EVCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.56
Change+$0.31 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$52.15
Change+$0.82 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
EVCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. EVCGX (43.7M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: EVCGX (1.64) vs FHKAX (0.85). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than EVCGX (5%) vs EVCGX (5%). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKAX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKAX (34.99) and EVCGX (34.71) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.93 vs. EVCGX (-36.38).
| EVCGX | FHKAX | EVCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.18 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.18 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.912 | 33.811 | 80% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.85 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.71 | 34.99 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.87 | 76.91 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.38 | -3.93 | 926% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.78 | 85.97 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement