Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKCX
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.56
Change+$0.31 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.00
Change+$0.83 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. EVCGX (43.7M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EVCGX (1.64) vs FHKCX (0.96). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKCX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKCX (35.35) and EVCGX (34.71) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : -2.35 vs. EVCGX (-36.38).
| EVCGX | FHKCX | EVCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.91 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.91 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.912 | 34.148 | 79% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.96 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.71 | 35.35 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.87 | 78.45 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.38 | -2.35 | 1,548% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.78 | 89.33 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement