Ad is loading...
EVCGX vs FHKCX
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$16.18
Change+$0.23 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.77M
Fidelity China Region
Price$40.74
Change+$0.33 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Buy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. EVCGX (37.8M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EVCGX (1.97) vs FHKCX (1.39). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKCX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). EVCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.67 vs. FHKCX (13.87). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.14 vs. EVCGX (-29.73).
| EVCGX | FHKCX | EVCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.91 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.91 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.918 | 3.908 | 279% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.8M | 1.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.67 | 13.87 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.01 | 33.46 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.73 | 8.14 | -365% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.95 | 12.91 | -240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers