Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKCX
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$17.31
Change+$0.16 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.76M
Fidelity China Region
Price$46.53
Change+$0.27 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a StrongBuy and FHKCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. EVCGX (39.8M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EVCGX (1.85) vs FHKCX (1.22). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKCX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). EVCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.02 vs. FHKCX (24.87). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.15 vs. EVCGX (-31.51).
| EVCGX | FHKCX | EVCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.91 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.91 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.263 | 18.951 | 102% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.8M | 1.24B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 1.22 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.02 | 24.87 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.88 | 39.33 | -25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.51 | 3.15 | -999% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.90 | 44.60 | -47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement