Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKTX
EVCGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.56
Change+$0.31 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$51.62
Change+$0.81 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
EVCGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. EVCGX (43.7M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: EVCGX (1.64) vs FHKTX (0.77). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKTX (18 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). EVCGX initial investment is less costly to investors than FHKTX (4%) vs FHKTX (4%). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKTX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). EVCGX (34.71) and FHKTX (34.66) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -5.28 vs. EVCGX (-36.38).
| EVCGX | FHKTX | EVCGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.43 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.43 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.912 | 33.535 | 80% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.77 | 214% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.71 | 34.66 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.87 | 75.58 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.38 | -5.28 | 690% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.78 | 83.43 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement