Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs TRCLX
EVCGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$19.58
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.7M
EVCGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.7M vs. EVCGX (45.5M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EVCGX (1.58) vs TRCLX (1.34). EVCGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EVCGX (33 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than EVCGX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. EVCGX (77.00). EVCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: EVCGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). EVCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.52 vs. TRCLX (18.81). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 0.52 vs. EVCGX (-26.60).
| EVCGX | TRCLX | EVCGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.03 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.022 | 33.049 | 109% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 66.7M | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.34 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.52 | 18.81 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.75 | 33.99 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.60 | 0.52 | -5,148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement