Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs TRCLX
EVCGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$17.35
Change-$0.06 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.42
Change+$0.12 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.91M
EVCGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 51.9M vs. EVCGX (41.1M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EVCGX (1.80) vs TRCLX (1.56). EVCGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EVCGX (33 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than EVCGX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. EVCGX (77.00). EVCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: EVCGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). EVCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.47 vs. TRCLX (30.04). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.16 vs. EVCGX (-31.93).
| EVCGX | TRCLX | EVCGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.03 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.071 | 16.477 | 128% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 51.9M | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.56 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.47 | 30.04 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.98 | 6.60 | -60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.93 | -9.16 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement