Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs TRCLX
EVCGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.14
Change-$0.10 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.21
Change-$0.04 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.91M
EVCGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 60.9M vs. EVCGX (41.1M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EVCGX (1.70) vs TRCLX (1.39). EVCGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EVCGX (33 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than EVCGX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. EVCGX (77.00). EVCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: EVCGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). EVCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.70 vs. TRCLX (38.64). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.21 vs. EVCGX (-30.82).
| EVCGX | TRCLX | EVCGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.03 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.843 | 25.473 | 105% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 60.9M | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.39 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.70 | 38.64 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.41 | 17.20 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.82 | -5.21 | 592% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement