EVGPF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.02 (-22.22%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
SHMSF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.06 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
262.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EVGPF vs SHMSF

Header iconEVGPF vs SHMSF Comparison
Open Charts EVGPF vs SHMSFBanner chart's image
Evergrande Property Services Group
Price$0.07
Change-$0.02 (-22.22%)
Volume$687
Capitalization1.26B
Shimao Services Holdings
Price$0.06
Change-$0.06 (-50.00%)
Volume$118
Capitalization262.12M
EVGPF vs SHMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EVGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EVGPF vs. SHMSF commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVGPF is a Hold and SHMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EVGPF: $0.07 vs. SHMSF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: EVGPF and SHMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EVGPF: 12% vs. SHMSF: 89%
Market capitalization -- EVGPF: $1.26B vs. SHMSF: $262.12M
EVGPF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.26B. SHMSF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $262.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EVGPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EVGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EVGPF is a better buy in the long-term than SHMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EVGPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHMSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EVGPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SHMSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EVGPF is a better buy in the short-term than SHMSF.

Price Growth

EVGPF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHMSF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +4.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+4.64% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EVGPF($1.26B) has a higher market cap than SHMSF($262M). SHMSF has higher P/E ratio than EVGPF: SHMSF (7.46) vs EVGPF (5.81). EVGPF YTD gains are higher at: -19.000 vs. SHMSF (-68.020).
EVGPFSHMSFEVGPF / SHMSF
Capitalization1.26B262M481%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.000-68.02028%
P/E Ratio5.817.4678%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EVGPFSHMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EVGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYPSX60.05N/A
N/A
ProFunds Consumer Disctnry Ultra Sec Svc
MNDGX15.68N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery R1
TLOFX10.00N/A
N/A
Transamerica Large Value Opps R4
LISGX73.57N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Small Cap IS
HILCX23.64N/A
N/A
Hartford International Value C

EVGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVGPF has been loosely correlated with SHMSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EVGPF jumps, then SHMSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EVGPF
1D Price
Change %
EVGPF100%
N/A
SHMSF - EVGPF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VGPBF - EVGPF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AIRE - EVGPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.98%
TRPTF - EVGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
MGAG - EVGPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More