EVO vs MKGAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVO is a Sell and MKGAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EVO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMKGAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EVO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MKGAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EVO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EVO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EVO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -1.28% price change this week, while MKGAF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +9.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +8.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
EVO is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+8.21% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| EVO | MKGAF | EVO / MKGAF | |
| Capitalization | 2.77B | 76.6B | 4% |
| EBITDA | -63.26M | 6.45B | -1% |
| Gain YTD | -73.743 | 12.050 | -612% |
| P/E Ratio | 476.19 | 20.96 | 2,271% |
| Revenue | 821M | 22.3B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 619M | 1.72B | 36% |
| Total Debt | 589M | 10.6B | 6% |
EVO | MKGAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MKGAF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EVO (98). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew significantly faster than EVO’s over the last 12 months.
MKGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EVO (100). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EVO’s over the last 12 months.
MKGAF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as EVO (94). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to EVO’s over the last 12 months.
MKGAF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as EVO (92). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to EVO’s over the last 12 months.
EVO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKGAF (52). This means that EVO’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKGAF’s over the last 12 months.
| EVO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% |
MKGAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MKGAF and AQST have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKGAF and AQST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MKGAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKGAF | 100% | +6.90% | ||
| AQST - MKGAF | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| EVO - MKGAF | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
| INDV - MKGAF | 18% Poorly correlated | +5.53% | ||
| EBS - MKGAF | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| AMPH - MKGAF | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
More | ||||