EVO vs TAK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVO is a StrongBuy and TAK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EVO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EVO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EVO’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EVO’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EVO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +0.23% price change this week, while TAK (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -6.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
EVO is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
TAK is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.06% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| EVO | TAK | EVO / TAK | |
| Capitalization | 2.77B | 43.1B | 6% |
| EBITDA | -63.26M | 1.01T | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 3.365 | 8.459 | 40% |
| P/E Ratio | 476.19 | 36.79 | 1,294% |
| Revenue | 821M | 4.17T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 619M | 317B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 589M | 4.66T | 0% |
EVO | TAK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TAK's Valuation (13) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for EVO (94) in the null industry. This means that TAK’s stock grew significantly faster than EVO’s over the last 12 months.
TAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as EVO (100) in the null industry. This means that TAK’s stock grew similarly to EVO’s over the last 12 months.
TAK's SMR Rating (76) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as EVO (91) in the null industry. This means that TAK’s stock grew similarly to EVO’s over the last 12 months.
EVO's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as TAK (51) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that EVO’s stock grew similarly to TAK’s over the last 12 months.
EVO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAK (57) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that EVO’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAK’s over the last 12 months.
| EVO | TAK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| THVRX | 28.32 | 0.23 | +0.82% |
| Thornburg International Equity R4 | |||
| RTXSX | 12.29 | 0.10 | +0.82% |
| Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets S | |||
| LICRX | 16.07 | 0.11 | +0.69% |
| Lord Abbett International Equity R3 | |||
| DCSVX | 10.27 | 0.03 | +0.29% |
| Dunham Small Cap Value C | |||
| CIBCX | 72.85 | 0.12 | +0.16% |
| American Funds Capital Income Bldr C | |||
TAK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAK has been loosely correlated with SGIOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAK jumps, then SGIOY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAK | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| SGIOY - TAK | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| ESAIY - TAK | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| HLN - TAK | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
| BNXTF - TAK | 32% Poorly correlated | +19.16% | ||
| TKPHF - TAK | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||