EVR
Price
$318.93
Change
+$0.79 (+0.25%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.28B
47 days until earnings call
FLD
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.32 (-8.91%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
167.98M
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EVR vs FLD

Header iconEVR vs FLD Comparison
Open Charts EVR vs FLDBanner chart's image
Evercore
Price$318.93
Change+$0.79 (+0.25%)
Volume$1.34K
Capitalization12.28B
Fold Holdings
Price$3.27
Change-$0.32 (-8.91%)
Volume$3.13K
Capitalization167.98M
EVR vs FLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EVR vs. FLD commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVR is a Buy and FLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EVR: $318.14 vs. FLD: $3.59)
Brand notoriety: EVR and FLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EVR: 97% vs. FLD: 139%
Market capitalization -- EVR: $12.28B vs. FLD: $167.98M
EVR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $12.28B. FLD’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $167.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EVR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EVR is a better buy in the long-term than FLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EVR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EVR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLD is a better buy in the short-term than EVR.

Price Growth

EVR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.96% price change this week, while FLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

EVR is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

FLD is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.76% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EVR($12.3B) has a higher market cap than FLD($168M). FLD has higher P/E ratio than EVR: FLD (218.80) vs EVR (28.82). EVR YTD gains are higher at: 15.871 vs. FLD (-67.658). FLD has less debt than EVR: FLD (79.9M) vs EVR (933M). EVR has higher revenues than FLD: EVR (3.24B) vs FLD (5.19M).
EVRFLDEVR / FLD
Capitalization12.3B168M7,321%
EBITDAN/A-29.75M-
Gain YTD15.871-67.658-23%
P/E Ratio28.82218.8013%
Revenue3.24B5.19M62,341%
Total CashN/A6.61M-
Total Debt933M79.9M1,168%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EVR: Fundamental Ratings
EVR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
35
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EVRFLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
31%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VMXXF0.100.03
+38.44%
VALHALLA METALS INC.
CGEMY28.480.03
+0.11%
Capgemini SE
DCHIF0.41N/A
N/A
Digital China Holdings Ltd.
MSUXF13.07N/A
N/A
Misumi Group, Inc.
RDBBF0.21-0.02
-10.10%
ARTICORE GROUP LTD.

EVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVR has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EVR jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EVR
1D Price
Change %
EVR100%
+1.67%
PIPR - EVR
90%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
MC - EVR
89%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
SF - EVR
88%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
GS - EVR
88%
Closely correlated
+2.51%
LAZ - EVR
87%
Closely correlated
+3.33%
More

FLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and PWP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and PWP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLD
1D Price
Change %
FLD100%
+5.28%
PWP - FLD
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
LAZ - FLD
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
EVR - FLD
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
MC - FLD
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
JEF - FLD
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
More