| EWA | EWL | EWA / EWL | |
| Gain YTD | 7.660 | 24.944 | 31% |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 1.42B | 93% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 6.00 | 83% |
| Yield | 3.04 | 1.85 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 30 years | - |
| EWA | EWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWL | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| ALC - EWL | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| CFR - EWL | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| ROG - EWL | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
| BAER - EWL | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
| LOGN - EWL | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A |