EWA | EWL | EWA / EWL | |
Gain YTD | 10.520 | 21.062 | 50% |
Net Assets | 1.57B | 1.32B | 118% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 6.00 | 83% |
Yield | 3.43 | 1.84 | 186% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 29 years | - |
EWA | EWL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 6 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago83% | 17 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWL | 100% | +0.31% | ||
ALC - EWL | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
CFR - EWL | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
ROG - EWL | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
BAER - EWL | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
LOGN - EWL | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A |