EWA | EWS | EWA / EWS | |
Gain YTD | 10.520 | 20.412 | 52% |
Net Assets | 1.57B | 742M | 211% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 26.00 | 19% |
Yield | 3.43 | 3.64 | 94% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 29 years | - |
EWA | EWS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 3 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago83% | 9 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWS has been loosely correlated with GRAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWS jumps, then GRAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWS | 100% | -0.15% | ||
GRAB - EWS | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
SE - EWS | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.81% |