EWA | FLGB | EWA / FLGB | |
Gain YTD | 2.724 | 10.729 | 25% |
Net Assets | 1.49B | 735M | 202% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 4.70 | 106% |
Yield | 3.78 | 4.06 | 93% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
EWA | FLGB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 11 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago82% | 18 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGB has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGB jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB | 100% | +0.94% | ||
SHEL - FLGB | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
NWG - FLGB | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
CCEP - FLGB | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
RIO - FLGB | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
WPP - FLGB | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
More |