EWA | FLGB | EWA / FLGB | |
Gain YTD | 5.155 | 7.827 | 66% |
Net Assets | 1.44B | 732M | 197% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 4.00 | 5.61 | 71% |
Yield | 3.67 | 3.81 | 96% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
EWA | FLGB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 4 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago84% | 10 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 3 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGB has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGB jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB | 100% | -0.11% | ||
NWG - FLGB | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
RIO - FLGB | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
HL - FLGB | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.65% | ||
WPP - FLGB | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
CRH - FLGB | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.32% | ||
More |