EWA | FLMX | EWA / FLMX | |
Gain YTD | 4.820 | 24.729 | 19% |
Net Assets | 1.48B | 47.3M | 3,129% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.19 | 263% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 9.92 | 50% |
Yield | 3.59 | 2.70 | 133% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
EWA | FLMX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago83% | 5 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMX has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLMX jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX | 100% | +0.02% | ||
OMAB - FLMX | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
PAC - FLMX | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
AC - FLMX | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.63% |