EWA | FLMX | EWA / FLMX | |
Gain YTD | 5.155 | 12.730 | 40% |
Net Assets | 1.44B | 64.5M | 2,233% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 4.00 | 11.16 | 36% |
Yield | 3.67 | 2.85 | 129% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
EWA | FLMX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago84% | 5 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMX has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLMX jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX | 100% | +1.29% | ||
OMAB - FLMX | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.37% | ||
PAC - FLMX | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
AC - FLMX | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.77% |