EWA | FLMX | EWA / FLMX | |
Gain YTD | 5.604 | -24.426 | -23% |
Net Assets | 1.48B | 91.6M | 1,618% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 4.00 | 11.16 | 36% |
Yield | 3.67 | 2.85 | 129% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
EWA | FLMX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 14 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% | 2 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMX has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLMX jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX | 100% | -0.73% | ||
OMAB - FLMX | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
PAC - FLMX | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
AC - FLMX | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.16% |