Ad is loading...
EWA vs QAT
EWA vs QAT Comparison
Open Charts EWA vs QAT
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Price$24.51
Change+$0.51 (+2.12%)
Volume$1.02M
Net Assets1.49B
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
Price$18.12
Change+$0.22 (+1.23%)
Volume$11.46K
Net Assets79.49M
EWA vs QAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWA vs. QAT commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWA is a Buy and QAT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWA has more net assets: 1.49B vs. QAT (79.5M). EWA has a higher annual dividend yield than QAT: EWA (2.724) vs QAT (1.060). EWA was incepted earlier than QAT: EWA (29 years) vs QAT (11 years). EWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than QAT (0.60). QAT has a higher turnover EWA (5.00) vs EWA (5.00).
| EWA | QAT | EWA / QAT | |
| Gain YTD | 2.724 | 1.060 | 257% |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 79.5M | 1,869% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.60 | 83% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 27.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 3.78 | 5.89 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWA | QAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
QAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QAT and MARK have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QAT and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QAT | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| MARK - QAT | 14% Poorly correlated | -10.40% | ||
| ABL - QAT | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A |