EWC | EWL | EWC / EWL | |
Gain YTD | 14.333 | -0.098 | -14,652% |
Net Assets | 2.83B | 1.12B | 252% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 6.00 | 10.00 | 60% |
Yield | 2.17 | 2.15 | 101% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 29 years | - |
EWC | EWL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago84% | 14 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 4 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 7 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago51% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWL | 100% | +0.32% | ||
ALC - EWL | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
ROG - EWL | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
CFR - EWL | 19% Poorly correlated | -2.11% | ||
BAER - EWL | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
LOGN - EWL | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A |