EWC | EWL | EWC / EWL | |
Gain YTD | 14.809 | -0.246 | -6,023% |
Net Assets | 2.79B | 1.16B | 242% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 6.00 | 10.00 | 60% |
Yield | 2.17 | 2.15 | 101% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 29 years | - |
EWC | EWL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago84% | 13 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWL | 100% | -0.61% | ||
ALC - EWL | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
ROG - EWL | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
CFR - EWL | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
BAER - EWL | 2% Poorly correlated | -12.65% | ||
LOGN - EWL | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A |