EWC | GREK | EWC / GREK | |
Gain YTD | 24.877 | 65.599 | 38% |
Net Assets | 3.45B | 292M | 1,180% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.57 | 88% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 24.24 | 17% |
Yield | 1.69 | 3.95 | 43% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
EWC | GREK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago85% | 2 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago79% | 6 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GREK and SAR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GREK and SAR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GREK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GREK | 100% | +0.46% | ||
SAR - GREK | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
HTO - GREK | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
TEN - GREK | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
PPC - GREK | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
CCEC - GREK | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
More |