EWC | GREK | EWC / GREK | |
Gain YTD | 24.852 | 67.745 | 37% |
Net Assets | 3.31B | 311M | 1,066% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.57 | 88% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 24.24 | 17% |
Yield | 1.76 | 4.04 | 43% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
EWC | GREK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago61% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago85% | 3 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GREK and SAR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GREK and SAR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GREK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GREK | 100% | -1.03% | ||
SAR - GREK | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
HTO - GREK | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
TEN - GREK | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
CCEC - GREK | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
PPC - GREK | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
More |