EWC | QAT | EWC / QAT | |
Gain YTD | 14.333 | 3.973 | 361% |
Net Assets | 2.83B | 64.6M | 4,373% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 6.00 | 25.00 | 24% |
Yield | 2.17 | 4.04 | 54% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
EWC | QAT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago84% | 2 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 14 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that QAT and MARK have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QAT and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QAT | 100% | -1.83% | ||
MARK - QAT | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
ABL - QAT | -0% Poorly correlated | -1.95% |