It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EWCZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGROV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EWCZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GROV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
EWCZ (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -5.84% price change this week, while GROV (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -6.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.62%.
EWCZ is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
GROV is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2023.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
EWCZ | GROV | EWCZ / GROV | |
Capitalization | 630M | 62.2M | 1,013% |
EBITDA | 65.4M | -21.29M | -307% |
Gain YTD | -57.322 | -21.469 | 267% |
P/E Ratio | 75.88 | 0.13 | 57,329% |
Revenue | 221M | 259M | 85% |
Total Cash | 52.7M | 86.4M | 61% |
Total Debt | 380M | 89.6M | 424% |
EWCZ | GROV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 3 days ago87% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago56% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago49% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago73% | 20 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 2 days ago46% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PDEQX | 18.10 | N/A | N/A |
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq OppsR6 | |||
BISLX | 10.87 | -0.02 | -0.18% |
Brown Advisory Sustainable Intl Ldrs Inv | |||
CBBZX | 6.52 | -0.02 | -0.31% |
AB Relative Value Z | |||
HIISX | 14.45 | -0.06 | -0.41% |
Harbor International Small Cap Investor | |||
TQAIX | 45.62 | -0.52 | -1.13% |
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Sm Gr Eq I |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWCZ has been loosely correlated with HIMS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWCZ jumps, then HIMS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWCZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWCZ | 100% | -0.85% | ||
HIMS - EWCZ | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
HELE - EWCZ | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
IPAR - EWCZ | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.04% | ||
COTY - EWCZ | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
NWL - EWCZ | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GROV and EWCZ have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GROV and EWCZ's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GROV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GROV | 100% | -6.08% | ||
EWCZ - GROV | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
NUS - GROV | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
COTY - GROV | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
SPB - GROV | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
HELE - GROV | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
More |