EWG | KWT | EWG / KWT | |
Gain YTD | 33.677 | 22.395 | 150% |
Net Assets | 2.79B | 82.6M | 3,380% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 | 68% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 51.00 | 6% |
Yield | 1.65 | 3.35 | 49% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
EWG | KWT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago61% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago56% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago82% | 7 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been closely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that KWT and SHIP have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KWT and SHIP's prices will move in lockstep.