EWG | MXE | EWG / MXE | |
Gain YTD | 34.859 | 34.371 | 101% |
Net Assets | 2.86B | 60M | 4,770% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.51 | 33% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 166.37 | 2% |
Yield | 1.60 | 2.21 | 72% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 35 years | - |
EWG | MXE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 2 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago89% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 2 days ago90% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago82% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that MXE and AC have been poorly correlated (+-11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MXE and AC's prices will move in lockstep.