| EWG | VNAM | EWG / VNAM | |
| Gain YTD | 26.297 | 51.538 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 24.8M | 7,060% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 13.16 | 23% |
| Yield | 1.67 | 0.80 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 4 years | - |
| EWG | VNAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been closely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VNAM has been loosely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VNAM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VNAM | 100% | +1.56% | ||
| FRT - VNAM | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| CMG - VNAM | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| KOS - VNAM | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HUT - VNAM | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.57% | ||
| SSB - VNAM | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
More | ||||