| EWP | MXE | EWP / MXE | |
| Gain YTD | 62.559 | 45.081 | 139% |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 63M | 2,370% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.51 | 33% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 156.07 | 10% |
| Yield | 2.60 | 2.11 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 35 years | - |
| EWP | MXE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that MXE and ACGP have been poorly correlated (+-11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MXE and ACGP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MXE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MXE | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| ACGP - MXE | -11% Poorly correlated | -1.06% |