Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWT vs MCH
EWT vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts EWT vs MCH
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Price$63.21
Change-$0.11 (-0.17%)
Volume$4.83M
Net Assets6.53B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$30.15
Change+$0.43 (+1.45%)
Volume$7.93K
Net Assets24.34M
EWT vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWT vs. MCH commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a Buy and MCH is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 6.54B vs. MCH (24.3M). MCH has a higher annual dividend yield than EWT: MCH (36.728) vs EWT (22.121). EWT was incepted earlier than MCH: EWT (25 years) vs MCH (3 years). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover EWT (24.00) vs EWT (24.00).
| EWT | MCH | EWT / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 22.121 | 36.728 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 6.54B | 24.3M | 26,893% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.79 | 75% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 55.22 | 43% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 1.03 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWT | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 6 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 82% | 14 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.30% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.05% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 14% Poorly correlated | +4.49% | ||
More | ||||