Ad is loading...
EWT vs MCH
EWT vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts EWT vs MCH
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Price$49.62
Change-$1.05 (-2.07%)
Volume$13K
Net Assets4.76B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$24.99
Change+$0.14 (+0.56%)
Volume$803
Net Assets37.47M
EWT vs MCH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWT vs. MCH commentary
Mar 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a Buy and MCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 4.76B vs. MCH (37.5M). MCH has a higher annual dividend yield than EWT: MCH (12.698) vs EWT (-2.106). EWT was incepted earlier than MCH: EWT (25 years) vs MCH (3 years). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover EWT (24.00) vs EWT (24.00).
| EWT | MCH | EWT / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | -2.106 | 12.698 | -17% |
| Net Assets | 4.76B | 37.5M | 12,701% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.79 | 75% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 58.98 | 41% |
| Yield | 2.34 | 1.20 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWT | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.50% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| TME - MCH | -4% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||