EWU | QAT | EWU / QAT | |
Gain YTD | 18.171 | 6.414 | 283% |
Net Assets | 3.08B | 84.1M | 3,663% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.60 | 83% |
Turnover | 10.00 | 27.00 | 37% |
Yield | 3.53 | 5.67 | 62% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
EWU | QAT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 2 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago76% | 6 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWU has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWU jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that QAT and MARK have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QAT and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QAT | 100% | +1.49% | ||
MARK - QAT | 14% Poorly correlated | +3.44% | ||
ABL - QAT | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.39% |