Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWW vs FLLA
EWW vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts EWW vs FLLA
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
Price$60.19
Change+$0.96 (+1.62%)
Volume$9.93K
Net Assets1.73B
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$20.90
Change+$0.16 (+0.77%)
Volume$100
Net Assets34.97M
EWW vs FLLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWW vs. FLLA commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWW is a Hold and FLLA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWW has more net assets: 1.73B vs. FLLA (35M). EWW has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: EWW (28.791) vs FLLA (25.769). EWW was incepted earlier than FLLA: EWW (29 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EWW (0.50). FLLA has a higher turnover EWW (10.00) vs EWW (10.00).
| EWW | FLLA | EWW / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 28.791 | 25.769 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 35M | 4,951% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.19 | 263% |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 14.31 | 70% |
| Yield | 4.43 | 5.56 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWW | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EWW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWW | 100% | -1.51% | ||
| OMAB - EWW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| AC - EWW | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.05% |
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AC - FLLA | -3% Poorly correlated | -0.05% |