EWW | MKOR | EWW / MKOR | |
Gain YTD | 34.183 | 32.158 | 106% |
Net Assets | 1.78B | 66M | 2,702% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.79 | 63% |
Turnover | 10.00 | 41.08 | 24% |
Yield | 4.43 | 3.90 | 113% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
EWW | MKOR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 13 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago87% | 5 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWW | 100% | -1.74% | ||
OMAB - EWW | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
AC - EWW | -6% Poorly correlated | -1.76% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MKOR and CPNG have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKOR and CPNG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MKOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MKOR | 100% | -0.94% | ||
CPNG - MKOR | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.73% |