Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXBAX vs HBLRX
EXBAX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLRX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$15.01
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.07M
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$15.12
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.89B
EXBAX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLRX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Buy and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. EXBAX (304M). HBLRX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLRX (2.89) vs EXBAX (2.20). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: EXBAX (32 years) vs HBLRX (15 years). HBLRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than EXBAX (1.06). HBLRX (61.00) and EXBAX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXBAX: HBLRX (0) vs EXBAX (2000). EXBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.52 vs. HBLRX (2.99). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 14.64 vs. EXBAX (6.83).
| EXBAX | HBLRX | EXBAX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.28 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.28 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.571 | 8.856 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 11.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 2.89 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.52 | 2.99 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.91 | 24.39 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.83 | 14.64 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.06 | 42.14 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers