Ad is loading...
EXBAX vs HBLSX
EXBAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLSX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$14.20
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.45M
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.65B
EXBAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. EXBAX (299M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLSX (3.30) vs EXBAX (2.32). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: EXBAX (32 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and EXBAX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXBAX: HBLSX (0) vs EXBAX (2000). EXBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. HBLSX (2.76). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.78 vs. EXBAX (10.42).
| EXBAX | HBLSX | EXBAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.571 | 1.624 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 11.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 3.30 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | 2.76 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.96 | 8.86 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.42 | 17.78 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.47 | 31.83 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...