Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXBAX vs HBLSX
EXBAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLSX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$14.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.13M
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.22
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.96B
EXBAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLSX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. EXBAX (306M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLSX (3.17) vs EXBAX (2.21). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: EXBAX (32 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and EXBAX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXBAX: HBLSX (0) vs EXBAX (2000). EXBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.49 vs. HBLSX (2.35). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.25 vs. EXBAX (7.62).
| EXBAX | HBLSX | EXBAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.143 | 8.449 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 12B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 3.17 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | 2.35 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.20 | 18.88 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.62 | 16.25 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.65 | 47.35 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers