Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXBAX vs HBLSX
EXBAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLSX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$15.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.91M
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.32
Change+$0.06 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.73B
EXBAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLSX commentary
Nov 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a StrongBuy and HBLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. EXBAX (298M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLSX (3.19) vs EXBAX (2.18). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: EXBAX (32 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and EXBAX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXBAX: HBLSX (0) vs EXBAX (2000). EXBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.00 vs. HBLSX (2.84). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 12.14 vs. EXBAX (4.14).
| EXBAX | HBLSX | EXBAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.214 | 9.675 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 298M | 11.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.18 | 3.19 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | 2.84 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.67 | 15.63 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.14 | 12.14 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.85 | 44.23 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers