Ad is loading...
EXBAX vs HBLSX
EXBAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLSX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$13.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.16M
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.53B
EXBAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Hold and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. EXBAX (292M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLSX (3.26) vs EXBAX (2.33). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: EXBAX (32 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). EXBAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and EXBAX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXBAX: HBLSX (0) vs EXBAX (2000). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.92 vs. EXBAX (2.95). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 14.66 vs. EXBAX (8.11).
| EXBAX | HBLSX | EXBAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.96 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.96 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.571 | -0.073 | 2,157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 11.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 3.26 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.95 | 3.92 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.79 | 3.01 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.11 | 14.66 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.62 | 28.69 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...