Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXBAX vs VWINX
EXBAX vs VWINX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs VWINX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$14.68
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.4M
Vanguard Wellesley® Income I
Price$25.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.31B
EXBAX vs VWINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. VWINX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a StrongBuy and VWINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWINX has more cash in the bank: 48.3B vs. EXBAX (296M). VWINX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: VWINX (3.51) vs EXBAX (2.24). EXBAX was incepted earlier than VWINX: EXBAX (32 years) vs VWINX (55 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than VWINX (0.23). EXBAX (59.00) and VWINX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. EXBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWINX: EXBAX (2000) vs VWINX (3000). VWINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.15 vs. EXBAX (3.69). EXBAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.47 vs. VWINX (1.90).
| EXBAX | VWINX | EXBAX / VWINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.23 | 461% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.23 | 461% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 55 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.857 | 5.759 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 48.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 3.51 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.69 | 4.15 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.69 | 5.01 | 293% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.47 | 1.90 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.25 | 23.40 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement