Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXEYX vs RGACX
EXEYX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EXEYX vs RGACX
Manning & Napier Equity Series S
Price$15.51
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.91M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.27
Change-$0.77 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
EXEYX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXEYX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXEYX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. EXEYX (67.9M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EXEYX: RGACX (0.07) vs EXEYX (0.05). EXEYX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EXEYX (27 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EXEYX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). EXEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXEYX: RGACX (250) vs EXEYX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.91 vs. EXEYX (-2.29). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.48 vs. EXEYX (1.71).
| EXEYX | RGACX | EXEYX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.94 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.94 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.870 | 14.280 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.9M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.07 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.29 | 13.91 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.33 | 53.48 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.71 | 34.48 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.01 | 99.45 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement