Ad is loading...
EXFLX vs FGNSX
EXFLX vs FGNSX Comparison
Open Charts EXFLX vs FGNSX
Eaton Vance Ntnl Ultr Shrt Muni Inc A
Price$9.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.72M
Strategic Advisers Tx-Snstv Shrt Dur
Price$10.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.48B
EXFLX vs FGNSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXFLX vs. FGNSX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXFLX is a Hold and FGNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNSX has more cash in the bank: 3.48B vs. EXFLX (325M). EXFLX (3.21) and FGNSX (3.16) have matching dividends . EXFLX was incepted earlier than FGNSX: EXFLX (29 years) vs FGNSX (7 years). EXFLX (0.56) is less costly to investors than FGNSX (0.34). EXFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. FGNSX (68.00). FGNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXFLX: FGNSX (0) vs EXFLX (1000). FGNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.75 vs. EXFLX (3.16). FGNSX return over 5 years is better than : 9.85 vs. EXFLX (7.79).
| EXFLX | FGNSX | EXFLX / FGNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.34 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.435 | 0.672 | 65% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325M | 3.48B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 3.16 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.16 | 3.75 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.66 | 9.44 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.79 | 9.85 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...