Ad is loading...
EXHAX vs GWPDX
EXHAX vs GWPDX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs GWPDX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$23.71
Change-$0.87 (-3.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.89M
American Funds Growth Portfolio F3
Price$23.34
Change-$1.20 (-4.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.83B
EXHAX vs GWPDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. GWPDX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and GWPDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPDX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. EXHAX (445M). GWPDX pays higher dividends than EXHAX: GWPDX (0.80) vs EXHAX (0.64). EXHAX was incepted earlier than GWPDX: EXHAX (29 years) vs GWPDX (8 years). EXHAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GWPDX (0.38). EXHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWPDX: EXHAX (2000) vs GWPDX (1000000). EXHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.76 vs. GWPDX (0.62). GWPDX return over 5 years is better than : 68.59 vs. EXHAX (42.18).
| EXHAX | GWPDX | EXHAX / GWPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.38 | 292% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.38 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.601 | -3.651 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 445M | 19.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.80 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | 0.62 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.66 | 3.48 | -191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.18 | 68.59 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers