Ad is loading...
EXHAX vs GWPDX
EXHAX vs GWPDX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs GWPDX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$26.10
Change+$0.14 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets479.65M
American Funds Growth Portfolio F3
Price$26.68
Change+$0.23 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.3B
EXHAX vs GWPDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. GWPDX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and GWPDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPDX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. EXHAX (480M). GWPDX pays higher dividends than EXHAX: GWPDX (0.91) vs EXHAX (0.67). EXHAX was incepted earlier than GWPDX: EXHAX (29 years) vs GWPDX (8 years). EXHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GWPDX (1.00). EXHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWPDX: EXHAX (2000) vs GWPDX (1000000). GWPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.20 vs. EXHAX (9.96). GWPDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.73 vs. EXHAX (22.73).
| EXHAX | GWPDX | EXHAX / GWPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.923 | 4.751 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 480M | 21.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 19.20 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.57 | 12.74 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.73 | 43.73 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...