Ad is loading...
EXHAX vs RBGEX
EXHAX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$23.71
Change-$0.87 (-3.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.89M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$22.68
Change-$1.16 (-4.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.83B
EXHAX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RBGEX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. EXHAX (445M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: EXHAX (0.64) vs RBGEX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: EXHAX (29 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). EXHAX (1.17) and RBGEX (1.17) have similar cost to investors . RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RBGEX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). EXHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.76 vs. RBGEX (-0.33). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.56 vs. EXHAX (42.18).
| EXHAX | RBGEX | EXHAX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.17 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.17 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.601 | -3.871 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 445M | 19.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | -0.33 | -228% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.66 | 1.39 | -479% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.18 | 63.56 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.69 | 52.80 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...