Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RBGEX
EXHAX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.16
Change-$0.24 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets451.26M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$25.19
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.16B
EXHAX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RBGEX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 21.2B vs. EXHAX (451M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: EXHAX (0.63) vs RBGEX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: EXHAX (30 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). RBGEX (1.17) is less costly to investors than EXHAX (1.10). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RBGEX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.18 vs. EXHAX (2.18). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.93 vs. EXHAX (23.36).
| EXHAX | RBGEX | EXHAX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.17 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.17 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.721 | 1.573 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 451M | 21.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | 5.18 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.44 | 29.99 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.36 | 42.93 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.37 | 58.02 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers