Ad is loading...
EXHAX vs RBGEX
EXHAX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$26.10
Change+$0.14 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets479.65M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$25.95
Change+$0.22 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.3B
EXHAX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RBGEX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. EXHAX (480M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: EXHAX (0.67) vs RBGEX (0.34). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: EXHAX (29 years) vs RBGEX (10 years). EXHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RBGEX (1.00). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RBGEX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.06 vs. EXHAX (9.96). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.29 vs. EXHAX (22.73).
| EXHAX | RBGEX | EXHAX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.923 | 4.637 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 480M | 21.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.34 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 18.06 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.57 | 10.46 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.73 | 39.29 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.03 | 74.57 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...