Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RBGEX
EXHAX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$26.81
Change+$0.11 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets465.35M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$28.38
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.89B
EXHAX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RBGEX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. EXHAX (465M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: EXHAX (0.58) vs RBGEX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: EXHAX (30 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). RBGEX (1.17) is less costly to investors than EXHAX (1.10). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RBGEX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.74 vs. EXHAX (3.06). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.95 vs. EXHAX (15.91).
| EXHAX | RBGEX | EXHAX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.17 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.17 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.326 | 14.435 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 465M | 23.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | 15.74 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.43 | 47.98 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.91 | 38.95 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.30 | 91.56 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers