EXP
Price
$195.95
Change
-$6.62 (-3.27%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
40 days until earnings call
HCMLY
Price
$22.99
Change
-$0.79 (-3.32%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
39.08B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EXP vs HCMLY

Header iconEXP vs HCMLY Comparison
Open Charts EXP vs HCMLYBanner chart's image
Eagle Materials
Price$195.95
Change-$6.62 (-3.27%)
Volume$282.77K
Capitalization9.3B
HOLCIM
Price$22.99
Change-$0.79 (-3.32%)
Volume$47.46K
Capitalization39.08B
EXP vs HCMLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
EXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EXP vs. HCMLY commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXP is a Hold and HCMLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (EXP: $195.95 vs. HCMLY: $22.99)
Brand notoriety: EXP and HCMLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EXP: 70% vs. HCMLY: 43%
Market capitalization -- EXP: $9.3B vs. HCMLY: $39.08B
EXP [@Construction Materials] is valued at $9.3B. HCMLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $39.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EXP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EXP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLY is a better buy in the long-term than EXP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EXP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EXP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EXP is a better buy in the short-term than HCMLY.

Price Growth

EXP (@Construction Materials) experienced а -2.19% price change this week, while HCMLY (@Construction Materials) price change was +0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

EXP is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

HCMLY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.08% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLY($39.1B) has a higher market cap than EXP($9.3B). EXP has higher P/E ratio than HCMLY: EXP (19.03) vs HCMLY (10.41). HCMLY YTD gains are higher at: 32.542 vs. EXP (-20.498). HCMLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.78B vs. EXP (829M). HCMLY has more cash in the bank: 3.65B vs. EXP (48.9M). HCMLY has higher revenues than EXP: HCMLY (27.6B) vs EXP (2.25B).
EXPHCMLYEXP / HCMLY
Capitalization9.3B39.1B24%
EBITDA829M7.78B11%
Gain YTD-20.49832.542-63%
P/E Ratio19.0310.41183%
Revenue2.25B27.6B8%
Total Cash48.9M3.65B1%
Total Debt1.06BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EXP vs HCMLY: Fundamental Ratings
EXP
HCMLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
363
SMR RATING
1..100
2999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7230
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as EXP (19) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EXP (36) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's SMR Rating (29) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for HCMLY (99) in the null industry. This means that EXP’s stock grew significantly faster than HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EXP (83) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EXP’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EXP (72) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EXP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EXPHCMLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STIP102.220.05
+0.05%
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
CVY25.78-0.10
-0.40%
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
FTBD48.73-0.21
-0.43%
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF
IVOV92.72-1.30
-1.39%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
METV15.95-0.27
-1.66%
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF