It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EXP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EXP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
EXP (@Construction Materials) experienced а -3.93% price change this week, while HCMLY (@Construction Materials) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -3.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.33%.
EXP is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
EXP | HCMLY | EXP / HCMLY | |
Capitalization | 9.3B | 39.1B | 24% |
EBITDA | 829M | 7.78B | 11% |
Gain YTD | 31.850 | 31.216 | 102% |
P/E Ratio | 19.03 | 10.41 | 183% |
Revenue | 2.25B | 27.6B | 8% |
Total Cash | 48.9M | 3.65B | 1% |
Total Debt | 1.06B | N/A | - |
EXP | HCMLY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCMLY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as EXP (19) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.
EXP's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as HCMLY (8) in the null industry. This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.
EXP's SMR Rating (27) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for HCMLY (98) in the null industry. This means that EXP’s stock grew significantly faster than HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.
HCMLY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as EXP (54) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.
HCMLY's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as EXP (48) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.
EXP | HCMLY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 6 days ago38% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago45% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago48% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago74% | 16 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago51% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago49% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago63% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VIXM | 14.52 | 0.08 | +0.55% |
ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures | |||
NOVZ | 42.38 | 0.05 | +0.12% |
TrueShares Structured Outcome Nov ETF | |||
TBUX | 49.80 | -0.07 | -0.14% |
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | |||
EUSA | 98.19 | -0.74 | -0.74% |
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | |||
XLI | 136.29 | -1.26 | -0.92% |
The Industrial Select Sector SPDR® ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDELY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDELY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCMLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HCMLY | 100% | -0.50% | ||
HDELY - HCMLY | 67% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
CRH - HCMLY | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
SUM - HCMLY | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
EXP - HCMLY | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
VMC - HCMLY | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
More |