EXP
Price
$230.23
Change
+$0.40 (+0.17%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
10 days until earnings call
LOMA
Price
$11.51
Change
+$0.25 (+2.22%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EXP vs LOMA

Header iconEXP vs LOMA Comparison
Open Charts EXP vs LOMABanner chart's image
Eagle Materials
Price$230.23
Change+$0.40 (+0.17%)
Volume$213.52K
Capitalization9.3B
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$11.51
Change+$0.25 (+2.22%)
Volume$278.38K
Capitalization1.01B
EXP vs LOMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
EXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EXP vs. LOMA commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXP is a StrongBuy and LOMA is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (EXP: $230.23 vs. LOMA: $11.51)
Brand notoriety: EXP and LOMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EXP: 53% vs. LOMA: 83%
Market capitalization -- EXP: $9.3B vs. LOMA: $1.01B
EXP [@Construction Materials] is valued at $9.3B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EXP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EXP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the long-term than EXP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EXP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EXP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LOMA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the short-term than EXP.

Price Growth

EXP (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.60% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

EXP is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.79% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EXP($9.3B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.01B). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than EXP: LOMA (20.19) vs EXP (19.03). LOMA YTD gains are higher at: -3.601 vs. EXP (-6.589). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.9B vs. EXP (829M). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 20.9B vs. EXP (48.9M). EXP has less debt than LOMA: EXP (1.06B) vs LOMA (97.9B). LOMA has higher revenues than EXP: LOMA (136B) vs EXP (2.25B).
EXPLOMAEXP / LOMA
Capitalization9.3B1.01B919%
EBITDA829M39.9B2%
Gain YTD-6.589-3.601183%
P/E Ratio19.0320.1994%
Revenue2.25B136B2%
Total Cash48.9M20.9B0%
Total Debt1.06B97.9B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EXP vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
EXP
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1475
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2415
SMR RATING
1..100
2939
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (20). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (24). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's SMR Rating (29) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (39). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (59). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (100). This means that EXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EXPLOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QCBGX20.830.01
+0.05%
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
FGDCX31.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Gold C
ODVIX39.67N/A
N/A
Invesco Developing Markets R6
FESMX10.68N/A
N/A
First Eagle U.S. SMID Cap Opportunity I
PORIX55.54N/A
N/A
Trillium ESG Global Equity Institutional

EXP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXP has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EXP jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EXP
1D Price
Change %
EXP100%
+0.17%
MLM - EXP
81%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
VMC - EXP
77%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
KNF - EXP
71%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
BCC - EXP
70%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
CRH - EXP
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
More

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
+2.22%
CRH - LOMA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
CX - LOMA
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
KNF - LOMA
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
EXP - LOMA
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
USLM - LOMA
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More