It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EXP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EXP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
EXP (@Construction Materials) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was +19.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.
EXP is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
LOMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
EXP | LOMA | EXP / LOMA | |
Capitalization | 9.3B | 1.01B | 919% |
EBITDA | 829M | 39.9B | 2% |
Gain YTD | -12.209 | -8.794 | 139% |
P/E Ratio | 19.03 | 20.19 | 94% |
Revenue | 2.25B | 136B | 2% |
Total Cash | 48.9M | 20.9B | 0% |
Total Debt | 1.06B | 97.9B | 1% |
EXP | LOMA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (20). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.
LOMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (23). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.
EXP's SMR Rating (29) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (39). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.
LOMA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EXP (74). This means that LOMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than EXP’s over the last 12 months.
EXP's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (95). This means that EXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.
EXP | LOMA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago75% | 5 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 11 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago81% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FNDF | 35.81 | 0.40 | +1.13% |
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF | |||
SCHY | 25.60 | 0.26 | +1.03% |
Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | |||
CGV | 12.44 | 0.10 | +0.77% |
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF | |||
CSF | 50.92 | 0.07 | +0.13% |
VictoryShares US Discv Enh Vol Wtd ETF | |||
RMM | 13.24 | 0.01 | +0.10% |
RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXP has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EXP jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LOMA | 100% | -0.27% | ||
CRH - LOMA | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
CX - LOMA | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.85% | ||
KNF - LOMA | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
EXP - LOMA | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
USLM - LOMA | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
More |