EXPI
Price
$10.58
Change
-$0.20 (-1.86%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTHM
Price
$1.09
Change
-$0.01 (-0.91%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
35.79M
125 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EXPI vs FTHM

Header iconEXPI vs FTHM Comparison
Open Charts EXPI vs FTHMBanner chart's image
eXp World Holdings
Price$10.58
Change-$0.20 (-1.86%)
Volume$1.87M
Capitalization1.68B
Fathom Holdings
Price$1.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.91%)
Volume$112.65K
Capitalization35.79M
EXPI vs FTHM Comparison Chart in %
EXPI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTHM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EXPI vs. FTHM commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXPI is a Hold and FTHM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (EXPI: $10.58 vs. FTHM: $1.11)
Brand notoriety: EXPI and FTHM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EXPI: 138% vs. FTHM: 27%
Market capitalization -- EXPI: $1.68B vs. FTHM: $35.79M
EXPI [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.68B. FTHM’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $35.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EXPI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFTHM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EXPI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FTHM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EXPI is a better buy in the long-term than FTHM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EXPI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTHM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EXPI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FTHM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EXPI is a better buy in the short-term than FTHM.

Price Growth

EXPI (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -1.58% price change this week, while FTHM (@Real Estate Development) price change was -10.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

EXPI is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

FTHM is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-2.37% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EXPI($1.68B) has a higher market cap than FTHM($35.8M). EXPI YTD gains are higher at: -6.142 vs. FTHM (-27.778). EXPI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.03M vs. FTHM (-18.34M). FTHM has more cash in the bank: 4.88M vs. EXPI (49). EXPI has less debt than FTHM: EXPI (7K) vs FTHM (23.3M). EXPI has higher revenues than FTHM: EXPI (4.68B) vs FTHM (390M).
EXPIFTHMEXPI / FTHM
Capitalization1.68B35.8M4,693%
EBITDA-5.03M-18.34M27%
Gain YTD-6.142-27.77822%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.68B390M1,200%
Total Cash494.88M0%
Total Debt7K23.3M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EXPI: Fundamental Ratings
EXPI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EXPIFTHM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EXPI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTHM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTDTX17.100.05
+0.29%
Russell Inv Multifactor US Equity M
STRLX58.98N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital MdCp Relatv Val A
FRLCX13.89N/A
N/A
Nuveen Real Estate Securities C
FSCRX24.17N/A
N/A
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery
ACESX11.25-0.01
-0.09%
Invesco Equity and Income R

EXPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXPI has been loosely correlated with RMAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EXPI jumps, then RMAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EXPI
1D Price
Change %
EXPI100%
-1.86%
RMAX - EXPI
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
JLL - EXPI
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
CWK - EXPI
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
COMP - EXPI
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
CBRE - EXPI
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
More

FTHM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTHM has been loosely correlated with OPAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTHM jumps, then OPAD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTHM
1D Price
Change %
FTHM100%
+0.45%
OPAD - FTHM
41%
Loosely correlated
-5.38%
EXPI - FTHM
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
OPEN - FTHM
24%
Poorly correlated
-11.04%
KW - FTHM
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARL - FTHM
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.54%
More