EXPO vs LZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXPO is a Buy and LZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EXPO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EXPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EXPO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EXPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EXPO (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.94% price change this week, while LZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -9.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
EXPO is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
LZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-3.81% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.50% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| EXPO | LZ | EXPO / LZ | |
| Capitalization | 4.76B | 2.52B | 189% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 60.1M | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.805 | -27.699 | -28% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.96 | 191.57 | 23% |
| Revenue | N/A | 661M | - |
| Total Cash | 163M | 226M | 72% |
| Total Debt | 80.9M | 9.02M | 897% |
EXPO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EXPO | LZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 84% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TRAIX | 38.88 | -0.16 | -0.41% |
| T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation I | |||
| DFVQX | 13.67 | -0.08 | -0.58% |
| DFA International Vector Equity I | |||
| EKWDX | 59.33 | -0.41 | -0.69% |
| Allspring Precious Metals Admin | |||
| MJRFX | 22.81 | -0.17 | -0.74% |
| BlackRock Mid-Cap Value K | |||
| CRISX | 18.32 | -0.31 | -1.66% |
| CRM Small Cap Value Instl | |||
EXPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXPO has been loosely correlated with CTAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EXPO jumps, then CTAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EXPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXPO | 100% | +0.77% | ||
| CTAS - EXPO | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| ALLE - EXPO | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| CBZ - EXPO | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| DLB - EXPO | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| TRI - EXPO | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||
LZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZ has been loosely correlated with DNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZ jumps, then DNB could also see price increases.