EZPW vs FCFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a Hold and FCFS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EZPW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EZPW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FCFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EZPW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EZPW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FCFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EZPW (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.44% price change this week, while FCFS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -3.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
EZPW is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
FCFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-1.99% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
| EZPW | FCFS | EZPW / FCFS | |
| Capitalization | 625M | 5.75B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 168M | 907M | 19% |
| Gain YTD | 34.783 | -3.917 | -888% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.89 | 26.15 | 53% |
| Revenue | 1.09B | 3.15B | 34% |
| Total Cash | 219M | 127M | 172% |
| Total Debt | 607M | 1.92B | 32% |
EZPW | FCFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EZPW's Valuation (75) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (98). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (38). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
FCFS's SMR Rating (61) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EZPW (66). This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.
EZPW's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (72). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
EZPW's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (83). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
| EZPW | FCFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 13 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 40% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VUIAX | 82.06 | 1.16 | +1.43% |
| Vanguard Utilities Index Adm | |||
| LBWIX | 20.06 | 0.27 | +1.36% |
| BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I | |||
| WSMNX | 25.46 | 0.34 | +1.35% |
| William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth N | |||
| GVALX | 13.85 | 0.17 | +1.24% |
| Gotham Large Value Institutional | |||
| HWAAX | 37.43 | 0.38 | +1.03% |
| Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps A | |||
EZPW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EZPW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EZPW | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| FCFS - EZPW | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| UPBD - EZPW | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| ENVA - EZPW | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
| SLM - EZPW | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| AGM - EZPW | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
FCFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with UPBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then UPBD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFS | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| UPBD - FCFS | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| EZPW - FCFS | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| COOP - FCFS | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| ENVA - FCFS | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| COF - FCFS | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||