EZPW
Price
$16.67
Change
+$0.15 (+0.91%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.02B
75 days until earnings call
FCFS
Price
$147.16
Change
-$0.61 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.53B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EZPW vs FCFS

Header iconEZPW vs FCFS Comparison
Open Charts EZPW vs FCFSBanner chart's image
EZ
Price$16.67
Change+$0.15 (+0.91%)
Volume$16.86K
Capitalization1.02B
FirstCash Holdings
Price$147.16
Change-$0.61 (-0.41%)
Volume$4.14K
Capitalization6.53B
EZPW vs FCFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. FCFS commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a Buy and FCFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EZPW: $16.52 vs. FCFS: $147.77)
Brand notoriety: EZPW and FCFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 58% vs. FCFS: 83%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $1.02B vs. FCFS: $6.53B
EZPW [@Savings Banks] is valued at $1.02B. FCFS’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $6.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $679.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EZPW is a better buy in the long-term than FCFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCFS is a better buy in the short-term than EZPW.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Savings Banks) experienced а +4.23% price change this week, while FCFS (@Savings Banks) price change was +6.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.75% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($6.53B) has a higher market cap than EZPW($1.02B). FCFS has higher P/E ratio than EZPW: FCFS (22.66) vs EZPW (12.81). FCFS YTD gains are higher at: 43.954 vs. EZPW (35.188). FCFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 969M vs. EZPW (187M). EZPW has more cash in the bank: 472M vs. FCFS (101M). EZPW has less debt than FCFS: EZPW (762M) vs FCFS (2.02B). FCFS has higher revenues than EZPW: FCFS (3.39B) vs EZPW (1.23B).
EZPWFCFSEZPW / FCFS
Capitalization1.02B6.53B16%
EBITDA187M969M19%
Gain YTD35.18843.95480%
P/E Ratio12.8122.6657%
Revenue1.23B3.39B36%
Total Cash472M101M467%
Total Debt762M2.02B38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW vs FCFS: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
FCFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2623
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
810
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EZPW's Valuation (62) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (93). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (10). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's SMR Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (100). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (40). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (100). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWFCFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRECX13.56N/A
N/A
PGIM Select Real Estate C
GACIX49.09N/A
N/A
Gabelli Small Cap Growth I
ARSKX75.15N/A
N/A
Archer Stock
MKVEX16.74N/A
N/A
MFS International Large Cap Value R2
AUIAX35.83N/A
N/A
AB Equity Income A

EZPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EZPW
1D Price
Change %
EZPW100%
+0.73%
FCFS - EZPW
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
UPBD - EZPW
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
ENVA - EZPW
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
RM - EZPW
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
WRLD - EZPW
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More