EZPW
Price
$11.91
Change
+$0.06 (+0.51%)
Updated
Nov 14, 03:20 PM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
FCFS
Price
$107.12
Change
-$2.63 (-2.40%)
Updated
Nov 14, 03:19 PM (EDT)
77 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EZPW vs FCFS

Header iconEZPW vs FCFS Comparison
Open Charts EZPW vs FCFSBanner chart's image
EZ
Price$11.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
FirstCash Holdings
Price$107.12
Change-$2.63 (-2.40%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
EZPW vs FCFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. FCFS commentary
Nov 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a Hold and FCFS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2024
Stock price -- (EZPW: $11.86 vs. FCFS: $109.75)
Brand notoriety: EZPW and FCFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 121% vs. FCFS: 69%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $624.89M vs. FCFS: $5.75B
EZPW [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $624.89M. FCFS’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EZPW is a better buy in the long-term than FCFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FCFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCFS is a better buy in the short-term than EZPW.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +0.51% price change this week, while FCFS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.02% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($5.75B) has a higher market cap than EZPW($625M). FCFS has higher P/E ratio than EZPW: FCFS (26.15) vs EZPW (13.89). EZPW YTD gains are higher at: 35.698 vs. FCFS (2.185). FCFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 907M vs. EZPW (168M). EZPW has more cash in the bank: 219M vs. FCFS (127M). EZPW has less debt than FCFS: EZPW (607M) vs FCFS (1.92B). FCFS has higher revenues than EZPW: FCFS (3.15B) vs EZPW (1.09B).
EZPWFCFSEZPW / FCFS
Capitalization625M5.75B11%
EBITDA168M907M19%
Gain YTD35.6982.1851,634%
P/E Ratio13.8926.1553%
Revenue1.09B3.15B34%
Total Cash219M127M172%
Total Debt607M1.92B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW vs FCFS: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
FCFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1810
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1652
SMR RATING
1..100
6861
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9278
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EZPW's Valuation (76) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (98). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (52). This means that EZPW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's SMR Rating (61) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EZPW (68). This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (61). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EZPW (92). This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWFCFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBMO25.500.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bd ETF
FICS34.93-0.12
-0.34%
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
BBLB85.15-0.74
-0.86%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd20+YrETF
CGXU25.58-0.24
-0.93%
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
KURE15.42-0.26
-1.65%
KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF

EZPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EZPW
1D Price
Change %
EZPW100%
+0.76%
FCFS - EZPW
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
UPBD - EZPW
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
AGM - EZPW
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
ENVA - EZPW
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
PRAA - EZPW
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More

FCFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with UPBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then UPBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCFS
1D Price
Change %
FCFS100%
+1.69%
UPBD - FCFS
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
EZPW - FCFS
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
COOP - FCFS
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.46%
BBDC - FCFS
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
SLM - FCFS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More