F
Price
$11.69
Change
+$0.10 (+0.86%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.77B
22 days until earnings call
FUJHF
Price
$17.00
Change
-$0.50 (-2.86%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
14.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

F vs FUJHF

Header iconF vs FUJHF Comparison
Open Charts F vs FUJHFBanner chart's image
Ford Motor
Price$11.69
Change+$0.10 (+0.86%)
Volume$497.45K
Capitalization52.77B
Subaru
Price$17.00
Change-$0.50 (-2.86%)
Volume$586
Capitalization14.48B
F vs FUJHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUJHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
F vs. FUJHF commentary
Jul 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is F is a StrongBuy and FUJHF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2025
Stock price -- (F: $11.59 vs. FUJHF: $17.00)
Brand notoriety: F: Notable vs. FUJHF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: F: 75% vs. FUJHF: 72%
Market capitalization -- F: $52.77B vs. FUJHF: $14.48B
F [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $52.77B. FUJHF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $14.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

F’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUJHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • F’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUJHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, F is a better buy in the long-term than FUJHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

F’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUJHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • F’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUJHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, F is a better buy in the short-term than FUJHF.

Price Growth

F (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +6.82% price change this week, while FUJHF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +4.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

F is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

FUJHF is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+1.61% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
F($52.8B) has a higher market cap than FUJHF($14.5B). F has higher P/E ratio than FUJHF: F (12.31) vs FUJHF (10.53). F YTD gains are higher at: 22.661 vs. FUJHF (0.000). FUJHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 544B vs. F (11.8B). FUJHF has more cash in the bank: 1.37T vs. F (40.2B). F has less debt than FUJHF: F (151B) vs FUJHF (313B). FUJHF has higher revenues than F: FUJHF (3.77T) vs F (176B).
FFUJHFF / FUJHF
Capitalization52.8B14.5B364%
EBITDA11.8B544B2%
Gain YTD22.6610.000-
P/E Ratio12.3110.53117%
Revenue176B3.77T5%
Total Cash40.2B1.37T3%
Total Debt151B313B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
F vs FUJHF: Fundamental Ratings
F
FUJHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2468
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60100
SMR RATING
1..100
633
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8680
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

F's Valuation (11) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as FUJHF (14) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to FUJHF’s over the last 12 months.

F's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUJHF (100) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUJHF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for F (63) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that FUJHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than F’s over the last 12 months.

F's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as FUJHF (62) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to FUJHF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as F (86) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to F’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFUJHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUJHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYKE24.63N/A
N/A
Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
CNYA28.86-0.05
-0.17%
iShares MSCI China A ETF
BUYW14.08-0.04
-0.28%
Main BuyWrite ETF
HYRM23.36-0.12
-0.49%
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD HY Strat ETF
RDVY63.26-0.52
-0.82%
First Trust Rising Dividend Achiev ETF

FUJHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUJHF and HMC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUJHF and HMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUJHF
1D Price
Change %
FUJHF100%
-2.86%
HMC - FUJHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.86%
F - FUJHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
TM - FUJHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
GELYF - FUJHF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
GWLLY - FUJHF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More