It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
F’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRNLSY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
F’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNLSY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
F (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while RNLSY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -0.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.19%.
F is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
F | RNLSY | F / RNLSY | |
Capitalization | 52.8B | 12.5B | 422% |
EBITDA | 11.8B | 6.06B | 195% |
Gain YTD | -2.832 | 10.989 | -26% |
P/E Ratio | 12.31 | 6.43 | 191% |
Revenue | 176B | 46.4B | 379% |
Total Cash | 40.2B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 151B | N/A | - |
F | RNLSY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
F's Valuation (11) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as RNLSY (14) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to RNLSY’s over the last 12 months.
F's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNLSY (100) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNLSY’s over the last 12 months.
F's SMR Rating (75) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as RNLSY (93) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to RNLSY’s over the last 12 months.
F's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as RNLSY (58) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to RNLSY’s over the last 12 months.
F's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as RNLSY (36) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to RNLSY’s over the last 12 months.
F | RNLSY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago71% | 19 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago68% | 3 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNLSY has been loosely correlated with VWAGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RNLSY jumps, then VWAGY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RNLSY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RNLSY | 100% | +1.76% | ||
VWAGY - RNLSY | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
VWAPY - RNLSY | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
STLA - RNLSY | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
MBGYY - RNLSY | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
POAHY - RNLSY | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More |