Ford Motor Company and Stellantis N.V. are two of the world's largest legacy automakers, yet they sit at very different points in their respective cycles. F is a U.S.-centric manufacturer anchored by its highly profitable F-Series truck franchise, while STLA is a transatlantic group built from brands including Jeep, Ram, Peugeot, and Fiat. This stock comparison is most relevant for investors weighing a steadier, income-oriented name against a high-risk turnaround candidate, and for traders tracking how relative performance and market positioning shift across the automotive sector.
Ford Motor Company develops and sells vehicles under the Ford and Lincoln brands, organized into segments including Ford Blue (combustion and hybrid vehicles), Ford Pro (commercial fleet), and Ford Model e (electric vehicles). In recent market activity, F shares rallied sharply after the company reported third-quarter results that beat adjusted earnings expectations even as revenue narrowly missed estimates. Management cited cost discipline, record results in its software and parts businesses, and a recovery in F-Series pickup production after a year of supplier disruptions.
Sentiment has been supported by growth in paid software subscriptions, which have expanded rapidly, and by the launch of the Ford Energy battery-storage initiative. At the same time, rising commodity costs, recall and warranty exposure, and continued losses in the Model e electric-vehicle unit have kept some investors cautious. The shares still trade well below their 52-week high, and analysts have trimmed price targets in recent weeks even as the consensus rating remains favorable.
Stellantis N.V. is the parent of brands spanning Jeep, Ram, Dodge, Chrysler, Peugeot, Fiat, Citroën, and Opel, giving it a uniquely diversified footprint across North America and Europe. In recent weeks, STLA shares posted a double-digit single-session gain after third-quarter revenue beat estimates and management reaffirmed full-year guidance, signaling that its "Value Creation Program" cost-cutting effort is beginning to take hold.
The turnaround remains early-stage, however. The company swung its North American region back to a modest adjusted operating profit but recorded a loss in Europe, and industrial free cash flow was still deeply negative in the quarter. Management reiterated a target of roughly €6 billion (about $6.7 billion) in run-rate cost savings by 2028 and positive industrial free cash flow in 2027. Despite the recent bounce, the stock remains down more than 50% year to date, reflecting persistent concerns about pricing pressure, elevated U.S. inventory, and competition from both European and Chinese rivals.
Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, and performance statistics. Because not every bot suits every market environment, Tickeron curates a Trending AI Robots section highlighting the strategies that are most aligned with current conditions. These bots vary in approach—from short-term swing trading to longer-horizon trend following—and cover a broad range of securities, allowing traders to compare win rates, drawdowns, and trade frequency before committing capital. Whether you are tracking automotive names like F and STLA or diversifying across other sectors, the Trending AI Robots page offers a practical starting point for identifying automated strategies matched to the present market.
The two companies diverge sharply across several dimensions. F leans on a concentrated, high-margin North American truck and commercial-fleet business and is now layering on recurring software revenue and an energy-storage segment. STLA is broader geographically but more exposed to the fiercely competitive European mass-market, where pricing pressure and the shift toward lower-margin electric vehicles have weighed on profitability.
On momentum, F has been comparatively stable, with its recent rally building on steady profitability and an income component from its dividend. STLA is far more volatile: a dramatic rebound followed a prolonged slide, and its sustainability depends on executing cost savings and restoring cash generation. Risk profiles also differ—F faces recall and warranty costs plus EV losses, while STLA contends with negative free cash flow, inventory destocking, and a turnaround that analysts broadly characterize as still unproven.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would currently favor F over STLA. Ford's combination of more consistent price trends, positive adjusted free cash flow, a supportive dividend, and multiple emerging catalysts—software subscriptions and the energy-storage business—offers a more stable risk-reward profile. Stellantis, by contrast, shows a potentially attractive turnaround story but remains characterized by negative cash flow, regional profit divergence, and a still-unproven recovery. In probabilistic terms, the AI is more likely to assign higher relative positioning to F until STLA demonstrates sustained execution across both its major regions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The RSI Indicator for F moved out of oversold territory on October 27, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 27 of the 28 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on F as a result. In 63 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for F just turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where F's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 37 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
Following a +5.55% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where F advanced for three days, in 224 of 324 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
F may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for F moved below the 200-day moving average on October 21, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where F declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The Aroon Indicator for F entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. F’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. F’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 94 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.414) is normal, around the industry mean (2.030). P/E Ratio (-6.812) is within average values for comparable stocks, (14.188). F's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (8.543) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (2.450). Dividend Yield (0.047) settles around the average of (0.147) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.284) is also within normal values, averaging (2.648).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for STLA turned positive on October 28, 2026. Looking at past instances where STLA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where STLA's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 24 of 40 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 28, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on STLA as a result. In 46 of 72 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a +13.53% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where STLA advanced for three days, in 199 of 294 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where STLA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
STLA broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for STLA entered a downward trend on October 27, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 21 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 42 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.220) is normal, around the industry mean (2.030). P/E Ratio (-0.687) is within average values for comparable stocks, (14.188). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.817) is also within normal values, averaging (2.450). STLA's Dividend Yield (1.926) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.147). P/S Ratio (0.077) is also within normal values, averaging (2.648).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. STLA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. STLA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock worse than average.
F | STLA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 11 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STLA's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for F (94) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that STLA’s stock grew somewhat faster than F’s over the last 12 months.
F's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as STLA (100) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to STLA’s over the last 12 months.
F's SMR Rating (95) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as STLA (97) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to STLA’s over the last 12 months.
F's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as STLA (64) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to STLA’s over the last 12 months.
STLA's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for F (98) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that STLA’s stock grew significantly faster than F’s over the last 12 months.
| F | STLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 67% | 25 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 71% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
F’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while STLA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
F’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
F (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +6.03% price change this week, while STLA (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -4.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -31.66%.
F is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2027.
STLA is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2027.
Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLA has been loosely correlated with F. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLA jumps, then F could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STLA | 100% | +3.79% | ||
| F - STLA | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| GM - STLA | 43% Loosely correlated | +4.63% | ||
| RACE - STLA | 32% Poorly correlated | +4.26% | ||
| TM - STLA | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.35% | ||
| BLBD - STLA | 24% Poorly correlated | +5.43% | ||
More | ||||