FA
Price
$16.36
Change
+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.85B
67 days until earnings call
MMS
Price
$87.92
Change
+$0.20 (+0.23%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.95B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FA vs MMS

Header iconFA vs MMS Comparison
Open Charts FA vs MMSBanner chart's image
First Advantage
Price$16.36
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Volume$584.19K
Capitalization2.85B
MAXIMUS
Price$87.92
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
Volume$434.57K
Capitalization4.95B
FA vs MMS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FA vs. MMS commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FA is a StrongBuy and MMS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FA: $16.36 vs. MMS: $87.92)
Brand notoriety: FA and MMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FA: 61% vs. MMS: 81%
Market capitalization -- FA: $2.85B vs. MMS: $4.95B
FA [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $2.85B. MMS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $4.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMS is a better buy in the long-term than FA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MMS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMS is a better buy in the short-term than FA.

Price Growth

FA (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -4.44% price change this week, while MMS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +1.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

FA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.19% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMS($4.95B) has a higher market cap than FA($2.85B). FA has higher P/E ratio than MMS: FA (619.33) vs MMS (16.34). MMS YTD gains are higher at: 19.201 vs. FA (-12.653). MMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 648M vs. FA (183M). FA has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. MMS (59.8M). MMS has less debt than FA: MMS (1.78B) vs FA (2.14B). MMS has higher revenues than FA: MMS (5.43B) vs FA (1.25B).
FAMMSFA / MMS
Capitalization2.85B4.95B57%
EBITDA183M648M28%
Gain YTD-12.65319.201-66%
P/E Ratio619.3316.343,790%
Revenue1.25B5.43B23%
Total Cash184M59.8M308%
Total Debt2.14B1.78B120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMS: Fundamental Ratings
MMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAMMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVRVX26.27N/A
N/A
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Investor
BEXUX18.27N/A
N/A
Baron Emerging Markets R6
ERIFX12.64N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Balanced R
GSIHX22.44N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps A
DSHZX12.44N/A
N/A
Brinker Capital Destinations Shelter Z

FA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FA has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FA jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FA
1D Price
Change %
FA100%
+0.18%
BCO - FA
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
BRC - FA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
MSA - FA
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
MMS - FA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
ARLO - FA
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
More

MMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMS has been loosely correlated with DNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMS jumps, then DNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMS
1D Price
Change %
MMS100%
+0.23%
DNB - MMS
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ICFI - MMS
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
FA - MMS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
BRC - MMS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
ABM - MMS
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
More