Ad is loading...
FACDX vs FSPHX
FACDX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FACDX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACDX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. FACDX (3.74B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FACDX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FACDX (0.00). FACDX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FACDX (29 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FACDX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FACDX (37.00). FACDX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.77 vs. FACDX (-10.50). FACDX return over 5 years is better than : -2.74 vs. FSPHX (-6.51).
| FACDX | FSPHX | FACDX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.65 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.65 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.111 | -5.248 | 59% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.74B | 6.42B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.50 | -7.77 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.91 | -10.49 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.74 | -6.51 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.86 | 8.96 | 255% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...