Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FACDX vs FSPHX
FACDX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FACDX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACDX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. FACDX (3.35B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FACDX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FACDX (0.00). FACDX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FACDX (29 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FACDX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FACDX (37.00). FACDX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.07 vs. FACDX (-16.33). FACDX return over 5 years is better than : -12.29 vs. FSPHX (-16.73).
| FACDX | FSPHX | FACDX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.63 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.63 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.453 | -5.725 | 60% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 5.92B | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.33 | -14.07 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.95 | -2.60 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.29 | -16.73 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.62 | 4.82 | 386% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers