Ad is loading...
FACDX vs FSPHX
FACDX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FACDX vs. FSPHX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACDX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.74B vs. FACDX (3.96B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FACDX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FACDX (0.00). FACDX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FACDX (29 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FACDX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FACDX (37.00). FACDX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.89 vs. FACDX (-11.64). FACDX return over 5 years is better than : 12.15 vs. FSPHX (7.38).
| FACDX | FSPHX | FACDX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.65 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.65 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.899 | 0.844 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 6.74B | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.64 | -9.89 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.14 | 0.86 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.15 | 7.38 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.93 | 14.97 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...