Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FACDX vs SHSAX
FACDX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FACDX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACDX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.39B vs. FACDX (3.35B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FACDX: SHSAX (0.22) vs FACDX (0.00). FACDX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FACDX (29 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FACDX (0.93). FACDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). FACDX initial investment is less costly to investors than SHSAX (5%) vs SHSAX (5%). FACDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FACDX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.85 vs. FACDX (-16.33). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -10.54 vs. FACDX (-12.29).
| FACDX | SHSAX | FACDX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.09 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.09 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.453 | -0.897 | 385% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 110% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 6.39B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.33 | -14.85 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.95 | -1.17 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.29 | -10.54 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.62 | 6.07 | 307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement