FACO
Price
$3.21
Change
-$0.01 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.93M
LCSHF
Price
$7.59
Change
+$0.19 (+2.57%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.87B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FACO vs LCSHF

Header iconFACO vs LCSHF Comparison
Open Charts FACO vs LCSHFBanner chart's image
First Acceptance
Price$3.21
Change-$0.01 (-0.31%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization32.93M
Lancashire Holdings
Price$7.59
Change+$0.19 (+2.57%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.87B
FACO vs LCSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FACO vs. LCSHF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACO is a Hold and LCSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FACO: $3.21 vs. LCSHF: $7.59)
Brand notoriety: FACO and LCSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FACO: 29% vs. LCSHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FACO: $32.93M vs. LCSHF: $1.87B
FACO [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $32.93M. LCSHF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FACO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLCSHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FACO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LCSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FACO is a better buy in the long-term than LCSHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FACO’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FACO’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FACO (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while LCSHF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FACO is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

LCSHF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+0.83% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LCSHF($1.87B) has a higher market cap than FACO($32.9M). LCSHF has higher P/E ratio than FACO: LCSHF (21.83) vs FACO (12.12). FACO YTD gains are higher at: 5.941 vs. LCSHF (-8.664). FACO has less debt than LCSHF: FACO (55.4M) vs LCSHF (469M). LCSHF has higher revenues than FACO: LCSHF (1.01B) vs FACO (333M).
FACOLCSHFFACO / LCSHF
Capitalization32.9M1.87B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.941-8.664-69%
P/E Ratio12.1221.8356%
Revenue333M1.01B33%
Total Cash170MN/A-
Total Debt55.4M469M12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FACO vs LCSHF: Fundamental Ratings
FACO
LCSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27100
SMR RATING
1..100
5254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
445
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LCSHF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (62). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LCSHF (100). This means that FACO’s stock grew significantly faster than LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as LCSHF (54). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

LCSHF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (62). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LCSHF (45). This means that FACO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FACOLCSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGIAX109.301.02
+0.94%
Vanguard Growth & Income Adm
LPEIX7.070.06
+0.86%
ALPS Global Opportunity I
NWAVX14.610.11
+0.76%
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq R6
GERUX9.980.04
+0.40%
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts R6
DDIIX15.380.04
+0.26%
Macquarie Wealth Builder Institutional

FACO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACO and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACO and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACO
1D Price
Change %
FACO100%
-0.31%
HIPO - FACO
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
TRRSF - FACO
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCSHF - FACO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZLYF - FACO
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
JTGPF - FACO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCSHF and RYAN have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCSHF and RYAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCSHF
1D Price
Change %
LCSHF100%
N/A
RYAN - LCSHF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
FACO - LCSHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
TRRSF - LCSHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZLYF - LCSHF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
ACMTA - LCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More