FACO
Price
$3.40
Change
+$0.01 (+0.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
124.6M
LCSHF
Price
$8.29
Change
-$0.06 (-0.72%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.94B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FACO vs LCSHF

Header iconFACO vs LCSHF Comparison
Open Charts FACO vs LCSHFBanner chart's image
First Acceptance
Price$3.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.29%)
Volume$1.57K
Capitalization124.6M
Lancashire Holdings
Price$8.29
Change-$0.06 (-0.72%)
Volume$206
Capitalization1.94B
FACO vs LCSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FACO vs. LCSHF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACO is a Hold and LCSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FACO: $3.39 vs. LCSHF: $8.29)
Brand notoriety: FACO and LCSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FACO: 69% vs. LCSHF: 4%
Market capitalization -- FACO: $124.6M vs. LCSHF: $1.94B
FACO [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $124.6M. LCSHF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FACO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLCSHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FACO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LCSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FACO is a better buy in the long-term than LCSHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FACO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LCSHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FACO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LCSHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FACO and LCSHF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FACO (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -4.51% price change this week, while LCSHF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

LCSHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.20% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LCSHF($1.94B) has a higher market cap than FACO($125M). LCSHF has higher P/E ratio than FACO: LCSHF (9.01) vs FACO (5.48). FACO YTD gains are higher at: 12.211 vs. LCSHF (-0.241). LCSHF has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. FACO (401M). FACO has less debt than LCSHF: FACO (45.2M) vs LCSHF (469M). LCSHF has higher revenues than FACO: LCSHF (1.82B) vs FACO (522M).
FACOLCSHFFACO / LCSHF
Capitalization125M1.94B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.211-0.241-5,074%
P/E Ratio5.489.0161%
Revenue522M1.82B29%
Total Cash401M653M61%
Total Debt45.2M469M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FACO vs LCSHF: Fundamental Ratings
FACO
LCSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1127
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29100
SMR RATING
1..100
5567
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
514
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LCSHF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (63). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LCSHF (100). This means that FACO’s stock grew significantly faster than LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as LCSHF (67). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LCSHF (54). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as LCSHF (14). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FACOLCSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAGIY37.130.01
+0.03%
AIA Group, Ltd.
KUNUF0.99N/A
N/A
Kunlun Energy Co., Ltd.
CAIB0.08N/A
N/A
California International Bank
RRACF13.55N/A
N/A
Rigel Resource Acquisition Corp.
ZNNGY3.11N/A
N/A
Zhongyuan Bk Co Ltd

FACO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACO and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACO and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACO
1D Price
Change %
FACO100%
+0.29%
HIPO - FACO
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
TRRSF - FACO
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
LCSHF - FACO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZLYF - FACO
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
JTGPF - FACO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCSHF and RYAN have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCSHF and RYAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCSHF
1D Price
Change %
LCSHF100%
N/A
RYAN - LCSHF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
FACO - LCSHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
TRRSF - LCSHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
BZLYF - LCSHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMTA - LCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More